Why is Anthony Albanese determined to reward Satan’s agents, the criminal terrorists who started and can instantly stop the killings in Gaza?

From their own videos we know that they not only tortured and killed more Jews in one day than since the Holocaust, these even included tiny babies. We also know that the Hamas playbook, sometimes called their ‘CNN strategy’, includes, indeed requires, the deaths of thousands of Gazans.

Under this, the plan is to provoke Israel so severely that it will be impossible for her not to respond and then, using Gazans as human shields, wait for the corrupt mainstream Western media and delinquent Western politicians to condemn Israel for what Hamas is doing.

Then wait for the right moment to start the process again.

Meanwhile, Mr Albanese justifies his plan to recognise the so-called Palestinian state by revealing he has supported the two-state solution ‘all his political life’. The only other occasion he has revealed this was when he claimed he was a ‘lifelong republican’.

But this was limited to what Australians for a Constitutional Monarchy described as a ‘politicians’ republic’, one ensuring a delinquent prime minister who breaches a fundamental constitutional rule could not be removed. Since all of his political life has been spent in the hard, far left, he should reveal whatever other Marxist joys he has up his sleeve.

Now it’s true that if you only follow the corrupt mainstream media, you’ll blame Israel for what is happening in Gaza.

But unlike the rank and file, politicians like Mr Albanese or his British, French and Canadian counterparts have resources which allow them to easily ascertain the truth.

They would have hardly been surprised, for example, when the New York Times was caught out publishing a large front-page photo of an extremely ill 18-month-old Gazan boy, Mohammed Zakaria al-Mutawaq, knowing they were falsely claiming he was starving by not showing his ‘healthy and well-nourished brother’.

Nor would they be surprised when the NYTimes failed to do what any ethical newspaper would do: publish a prominent apology on the front page. They hid their explanation on an obscure X public relations post.

A major study by an international research team, 50 Global Group, of four months of reports by the top English-language news outlets (CNN, BBC, New York Times, Washington Post, Reuters, AP and ABC Australia) found 100 per cent of articles on casualties relied on statistics from the so-called Gaza Ministry of Health, without pointing out this was from Hamas terrorists. Only four per cent relied on Israel-provided statistics, with half declaring them ‘unverifiable’.

Despite this blind reliance on Hamas statistics by the leading outlets, their reports formed the basis of news presentations by most of the rest of the media.

Whatever Messrs Albanese, Starmer, Macron and Carney do is probably more about internal problems in their countries rather than foreign policy.

Instead of bringing immigrants for needed skills as was once the case, they are too often allowed in for their votes, even where they hope to put their new country under some alien system. Governments typically then design their actions in the Middle East to keep the new immigrants’ votes.

As to the proposed two-state solution, this is really a three-state solution, given that Hamas ran Gaza and the Palestinian Authority has some responsibility in Judea and Samaria (the West Bank) and they spend a good part of their time fighting and killing one another.

Meanwhile it should be remembered that having been there for up to 3,500 years, the Jewish people are by far the original surviving inhabitants of Israel.

Despite the administrative separation within the mandate in 1922 of Jordan as a future independent Arab state, the reason for the proposal by Lord Peele in 1937 for two states was the Arab revolt after both Jewish and Arab immigration, the latter being paradoxically caused by the considerable economic stimulation the Jewish people brought to Palestine. After this, and notwithstanding the terrible things happening in Germany, the British strictly controlled further Jewish immigration but exercised little control over Arab immigration.

Alan Dershowitz describes Palestine harshly as a ‘materially worthless oil-free piece of real estate in a backwater of the world’, but something which is of tremendous religious and historical significance to the Jews. In addition, even with Gaza, and Judea and Samaria (the West Bank), Israel is extremely small for two states, about 40 per cent of Tasmania and smaller than the Netherlands.

It should also be remembered that at the time the United Nations created the state of Israel, Jews were being expelled from a large number of Arab states where they had lived for generations, with Israel ultimately absorbing just under one million.

Yet when the surrounding Arab states invaded Israel, suggesting to local Arabs that they should leave and return when the Arab governments had expelled the Israelis, the Arab states did not subsequently absorb the departees but turned them into hereditary refugees.

Curiously, Israel at its foundation was strongly supported by the left. It then did two things which the left found unforgivable.

First, Israel has been extraordinarily successful as one of the most advanced technological countries in the world. Jews, representing 0.2 per cent of the world’s population, have won over a quarter, 26 per cent, of scientific and medical research Nobel prizes.

Second, Israel has won every one of the wars waged against her.

It is sometimes forgotten that not only are Jews targeted by militant Islamists, but so are Christians and the Druze. In fact, the Christian population in the region has long been falling or has disappeared in many places.

Only in Israel is Christianity growing.

Given that Israel has absorbed so many Jewish refugees from Arab and Muslim states, would it not be appropriate for the Arab states, especially the wealthier ones, to absorb those Arabs who do not wish to live in the only Jewish state in the world?

There will still be many Arabs in Israel, even in parliament and on the courts.

This would be a more practical one-state solution.

Hamas have already declared the decision by Western nations to recognise Palestine as being the ‘fruits of October 7’.

The simple reality is that in promising to recognise a completely unviable Palestinian state, the leaders of Britain, Canada, Australia and France are rewarding and encouraging more mass murder, rape, abduction and terror, and inviting it onto our own shores.